Bordeaux Mastiff |
||
FCI standard Nº 116 |
||
Origin |
France | |
Translation |
Tim Taylor and Raymond Triquet. Revised by Jennifer Mulholland 2007 | |
Group |
Group 2 Pinscher and Schnauzer-Molossoid breeds- Swiss mountain and Cattle Dogs | |
Section |
Section 2.1 Molossoid breeds | |
Working |
Without working trial | |
Acceptance on a definitive basis by the FCI |
Friday 01 January 1954 | |
Publication of the official valid standard |
Tuesday 04 November 2008 | |
Last update |
Friday 23 January 2009 | |
En français, cette race se dit |
Dogue de Bordeaux | |
Diese Norm ist in deutscher Sprache sichtbar |
Bordeaux dogge | |
En español, esta raza se dice |
Dogo de Burdeos | |
In het Nederlands, wordt dit ras gezegd |
Bordeaux Dog |
Usage |
Guard, defence and dissuasion. |
Brief historical summary |
The dogue de Bordeaux is one of the most ancient French breeds, probably a descendant of the Alans and, in particular, the alan vautre of which Gaston Phebus (or Febus), Count of Foix, wrote in the 14th century, in hisLivre de Chasse that “he holds his bite stronger than three sighthounds”. The word “dogue” appeared at the end of the 14th century. In the middle of the 19th century these ancient dogues were hardly renowned outside the region of Aquitaine. They were used for hunting large game such as boar, for fighting (often codified), for the guarding of houses and cattle and in the service of butchers. In 1863 the first French dog show took place in Paris in the Jardin d’Acclimatation. The Dogues de Bordeaux were entered under their present name. There have been different types : The Toulouse type, the Paris type and the Bordeaux type, which is the origin of today’s Dogue. The breed, which had suffered greatly during the two world wars, to the point of being threat ened with extinction after the second world war, got off to a fresh start in the 1960’s. 1st standard (“Caractère des vrais dogues”) in Pierre Megnin, Le Dogue de Bordeaux , 1896. 2nd standard in J. Kunstler, Etude critique du Dogue de Bordeaux, 1910. 3rd standard by Raymond Triquet, with the collaboration of Vet. Dr. Maurice Luquet, 1971. 4th standard reformulated according to Jerusalem model (FCI) by Raymond Triquet, with the collaboration of Philippe Serouil, President of the French Dogue de Bordeaux Club and its Committee, 1993. Precisions were added in 2007 by Raymond Triquet (Honorary President of the SADB), Sylviane Tompousky (President of the SADB) and Philippe Sérouil (committee member of the SADB). |
General appearance |
Typical concave lined brachycephalic molossoid. The Dogue de Bordeaux is a very powerful dog, with a very muscular body yet retaining a harmonious general outline. It is built rather close to the ground, the distance sternum-ground being slightly less than the depth of the chest. Stocky, athletic and imposing, it has a very dissuasive aspect. |
Important proportions |
• The length of the body, measured from the point of the shoulder to the point of the buttock, is superior to the height at the withers, in the proportion of 11/10. • The depth of the chest is more than half the height at the withers. • The maximum length of the muzzle is equal to one third of the length of the head. • The minimum length of the muzzle is equal to one quarter of the length of the head. • In the male, the perimeter of the skull corresponds more or less to the height at the withers. |
Behaviour / temperament |
An ancient fighting dog, the Dogue de Bordeaux is gifted for guarding, which it assumes with vigilance and great courage but without aggressiveness. A good companion, very attached to its master and very affectionate. Calm, balanced with a high stimulus threshold. The male normally has a dominant character. |
Head |
||
Cranial region |
||
Head |
Voluminous, angular, broad, rather short, trapezoid when viewed from above and in front. The longitudinal axes of the skull out of the bridge of nose are convergent (towards the front). The head is furrowed with symmetrical wrinkles, each side of the median groove. These deep ropes of wrinkle are mobile depending on whether the dog is attentive or not. The wrinkle which runs from the inner corner of the eye to the corner of the mouth is typical. If present, the wrinkle running from the outer corner of the eye to either the corner of the mouth or the dewlap should be discreet. | |
Skull |
- In the male: the perimeter of the skull measured at the level of its greatest width corresponds roughly to the height at the withers. - In bitches : it may be slightly less. Its volume and shape are the consequences of the very important development of the temporals, supra-orbital arches, zygomatic arches and the spacing of the branches of the lower jaw. The upper region of the skull is slightly convex from one side to the other. The frontal groove is deep, diminishing towards the posterior end of the head. The forehead dominates the face but does not overhang it. Howeverit is still wider than high. |
|
Stop |
Very pronounced, almost forming a right angle with the muzzle (95° to 100°). |
Facial region |
||
Nose |
Broad, well opened nostrils, well pigmented according to the colour of the mask. Upturned nose permissible but not if it is set back towards the eyes. | |
Muzzle |
Powerful, broad, thick, but not fleshy below the eyes, rather short, upper profile very slightly concave, with moderately obvious folds. Its width hardly decreasing towards the tip of the muzzle, when viewed from above it has the general shape of a square. In relation to the upper region of the skull, the line of the muzzle forms a very obtuse angle upwards. When the head is held horizontally the tip of the muzzle, truncated, thick and broad at the base, is in front of a vertical tangent to the anterior face of the nose. Its perimeter is almost two thirds of that of the head. Its length varies between one third and minimum one quarter of the total length of the head, from the nose to the occipital crest. The limits stated (maximum one third and minimum one quarter of the total length of the head) are permissible but not sought after, the ideal length of the muzzle being between these two extremes. | |
Lips |
Upper lip thick, moderately pendulous, rectractile. When viewed in profile it shows a rounded lower line. It covers the lower jaw on the sides. In front the edge of the upper lip is in contact with the lower lip, then drops on either side thus forming an inverted wide V. | |
Jaws and teeth |
Jaws : Jaws powerful, broad. Undershot (the unders hot condition being a characteristic of the breed). The back of the lower incisors is in front of and not in contact with the front face of the upper incisors. The lower jaw curves upwards. The chin is well marked and must neither overlap the upper lip exaggeratedly nor be covered by it. Teeth : Strong, particularly the canines. Lower canines set wide apart and slightly curved. Incisors well aligned especially in the lower jaw where they form an apparently straight line. | |
Cheeks |
Prominent, due to the very strong development of the muscles. | |
Eyes |
Oval, set wide apart. The space between the two inner corners of the eyelids is equal to about twice the length of the eye (eye opening). Frank expression. The haw must not be visible. Colour : hazel to dark brown for a dog with a black mask, lighter colour tolerated but not sought after in dogs with either a brown mask or without a mask. | |
Ears |
Relatively small, of a slightly darker colour than the coat. At its set on, the front of the base of the ear is slightly raised. They must fall down, but not hang limply, the front edge being close to the cheek when the dog is attentive. The tip of the ear is slightly rounded; it must not reach beyond the eye. Set rather high, at the level of the upper line of the skull, thus appearing to accentuate its width even more. |
Neck |
Very strong, muscular, almost cylindrical. This skin is supple, ample and loose. The average circumference almost equals that of the head. It is separated from the head by a slightly accentuated transversal furrow, slightly curved. Its upper edge is slightly convex. The well defined dewlap starts at the level of the throat forming folds down to the chest, without hanging exaggeratedly. The neck, very broad at its base, merges smoothly with the shoulders. |
Body |
||
Topline |
Well sustained. | |
Withers |
Well marked. | |
Back |
Broad and muscular. | |
Loin |
Broad. Rather short and solid. | |
Croup |
Moderately sloping down to the root of the tail. | |
Chest |
Powerful, long, deep, broad, let down lower than the elbows. Broad and powerful forechest whose lower line (inter-axillae) is convex towards the bottom. Ribs well let down and well sprung but not barrel shaped. The circumference of the chest must be between 25 cm to 35 cm greater than the height at the withers. | |
Underline and belly |
Curved from the deep brisket to the rather tucked up, firm abdomen, being neither pendulous nor too tucked up. |
Tail |
Very thick at the base. Its tip preferably reaching the hock and not below. Carried low, it is neither broken nor kinked but supple. Hanging when the dog is at rest, generally rising by 90° to 120° from that position when the dog is in action, without curving over the back or being curled. |
Limbs |
Forequarters |
||
Generality |
Strong bone structure, legs very muscular. | |
Shoulders |
Powerful, prominent muscles. Slant of shoulder-blade medium (about 45° to the horizontal), angle of the scapular-humeral articulation a little more than 90°. | |
Upper arm |
Very muscular. | |
Elbows |
In the axis of the body, neither too close to the ribcage nor turned out. | |
Forearm |
Viewed from the front, straight or inclining slightly inwards thus getting closer to the median plane, especially in dogs with a very broad chest. Viewed in profile, vertical. | |
Pastern |
Powerful. Viewed in profile, slightly sloping. Viewed from the front sometimes slightly outwards compensating for the slight inclination of the forearm inwards. | |
Forefeet |
Strong. Toes tight, nails curved and strong, pads well developed and supple : the Dogue is well up on his toes despite his weight. |
Hindquarters |
||
Generality |
Robust legs with strong bone structure; well angulated. When viewed from behind the hindquarter s are parallel and vertical thus giving an impression of power even though the hindquarters are not quite as broad as the forequarters. | |
Upper thigh |
Very developed and thick with visible muscles. | |
Lower thigh |
Relatively short, muscled, descending low. | |
Stifle |
In a parallel plane to the median plane or very slightly out. | |
Metatarsus |
Robust, no dewclaws. | |
Hock |
Short, sinewy, angle of the hock joint moderately open. | |
Hind feet |
Slightly longer than the front feet, toes tight. |
Gait and movement |
Quite supple for a molossoid. When walking the movement is free and supple, close to the ground. Good drive from the hindquarters, good extension of the forelegs, especially when trotting, which is the preferred gait. When the trot quickens, the head tends to drop, the topline inclines towards the front, and the front feet get closer to the median plane while striding out with a long reaching movement of the front legs. Canter with rather important vertical movement. Capable of great speed over short distances by bolting along close to the ground. |
Skin |
Thick and sufficiently loose fitting, without excessive wrinkles. |
Coat |
||
Hair |
Fine, short and soft to the touch. | |
Colour |
Self-coloured, in all shades of fawn, from mahogany to isabella. A good pigmentation is desirable. Limit ed white patches are permissible on the forechest and the extremities of the limbs. • Black mask : The mask is often only slightly spread out and must not invade the cranial region. There may be slight black shading on the skull, ears, neck and top of body. The nose is black. • Brown mask : (used to be called red or bistre). The nose is brown; the eyerims and edges of the lips are also brown. There may be non-invasive brown shading; each hair having a fawn or sandy zone and a brown zone. In this case the inclined parts of the body are a paler colour. • No mask : The coat is fawn : the skin appears red (also formerly called “red mask”). The nose can then be reddish. |
Size and weight |
||
Height at withers |
Height should more or less correspond to the perimeter of the skull. Height at the withers : For males: 60-68 cm. For females : 58-66 cm. 1 cm under and 2 cm over will be tolerated. |
|
Weight |
Dogs : at least 50 kg. Bitches : at least 45 kg. Females: Identical characteristics but less pronounced. |
Faults |
• Any departure from the foregoing points should be considered a fault and the seriousness with which the fault should be regarded should be in exact proportion to its degree and its effect upon the health and welfare of the dog and its ability to perform its traditional work. • Faults listed should be in degree of seriousness. |
Serious faults |
Disproportioned head (too small or exaggerately voluminous). Bulldoggy hypertype : Flat skull, muzzle measuring less than a quarter of the total length of the head. Swollen fold (roll) behind the nose. Important fold around the head. Important lateral deviation of the lower jaw. Incisors constantly visible when the mouth is closed. Very small incisors, unevenly set. Arched back (convex). Fused but not deviated vertebrae of the tail. Forefeet turning inwards (even slightly). Forefeet turning outwards too much. Flat thighs. Angle of hock too open (straight angulation). Angle of the hock too closed, dog standing under himself behind. Cow hocks or barrel hocks. Stilted movement or serious rolling of rear. Excessive shortness of breath, rasping. White on tip of tail or on the front part of the forelegs, above the carpus (wrist) and the tarsus (hock) or white, without interruption, on the front of the body from the forechest to the throat. |
Disqualifying faults |
Aggressive or overly shy. Long, narrow head with insufficiently pronounced stop, with a muzzle measuring more than a third of the total length of the head (lack of type in head). Muzzle parallel to the top line of the skull or downfaced, Roman nose. Twisted jaw. Mouth not undershot. Canines constantly visible when the mouth is closed. Tongue constantly hanging out when the mouth is closed. Blue eyes; bulging eyes. Tail knotted and laterally deviated or twisted (screw tail, kink tail). Atrophied tail. Fiddle front and down on pasterns. Angle of the hock open towards the rear (inverted hock). White on the head or body, any other colour of the coat than fawn (shaded or not) and in particular brindle or solid brown called “chocolate” (each hair being entirely brown). Identifiable disabling defect. |
NB : |
• Any dog clearly showing physical or behavioural abnormalities shall be disqualified. • The above mentioned faults when occurring to a highly marked degree or frequently are disqualifying. • Male animals should have two apparently normal testicles fully descended into the scrotum. • Only functionally and clinically healthy dogs, with breed typical conformation should be used for breeding. |
Bibliography |
https://www.fci.be/ |
Detailed history |
The Dogue de Bordeaux, whose history, like that of all the Dogues, goes back to the dawn of time, had the incomparable privilege of being recognized by the cynophile authorities of the last century as the most important French Mastiff. According to the famous veterinarian Pierre Mégnin, the Dogue de Bordeaux is derived from the Alans (also called Allants), these powerful molossoids that accompanied the Alans, a tribe of Indo-European origin settled between the Urals and the Caucasus, when pushed by the Huns, they swept over the lands of the Roman Empire, as far as Gaul and Spain. The Alans disappeared in the fifth century, but in Aquitaine and northern Spain, their famous Molosses crossed with autochthonous dogs with rather similar characteristics (we found some bones dating from prehistory), would have given birth to Dogue de Bordeaux and the Dogue de Burgos (which was represented in Spain from the Middle Ages). This is also the thesis defended by the eminent Professor Kunstler, who taught comparative anatomy at the University of Bordeaux. Used mainly as fighting dogs, the Aquitaine Dogs; they will only be called "masters of Bordeaux" in the nineteenth century; attacked in packs, and apparently, because, in the twelfth century, they contributed largely to the defeat of the English troops. It is only much later, in the eighteenth century, that we find trace of the Great Dane, and this, as noted by Dr. Maurice Luquet in his work Dogs and Bulldogs, under the brush of the famous animal painter Jean -Baptist Oudry who makes him appear in two of his works. As for Buffon, he also mentions it in his Histoire naturelle. Still, and it is an almost universal case in the history of the canine gent, it is only in the nineteenth century that the race was recognized a very specific identity. In 1863, in fact, the first dog show took place in the Jardin d'Acclimatation in Paris. If, in the minds of the cynologists of the time, it was not to judge the dogs against each other, but rather to draw up an inventory as complete as possible of the breeds existing in the second half of the nineteenth century, this exhibition allowed the Dogue d'Aquitaine to conquer its letters of nobility among a large public. Imposing himself quickly against the other Mastiffs of French origin thanks to his obvious peculiarities, especially in the type, the Dogue of Aquitaine, which one began to call Dogue de Bordeaux, polarized all the attention of the breeders who, during nearly thirty years old were going to fight each other to shape the future of this singular breed. These quarrels, which naturally concerned the definite characters to be definitively attributed to the Dogue de Bordeaux, especially its size, its conformation, the shape and length of its muzzle, but also the color of its mask, the existence of the prognathism and the importance of giving him, finally, over the color of his dress, had no other consequence than to delay the fixing of the race. In 1880, after certain breeders, without precise knowledge of the animal, had enriched the Dogue de Bordeaux with Mastiff blood, Pierre Mégnin and, with him, the Marquis de Cherville alerted the Committee of the Central Canine Society to put an end to these retreats, carried out indiscriminately and which threatened to distort the race for ever, and to finally endeavor to develop a standard worthy of the name. The action of these two enlightened cynologists was not without result, since one of the first acts of the committee, as noted humorously Dr. Luquet, was to "send back to their dear studies these judges, mostly British and Dutch, having never seen or studied this breed and who certainly knew better the recipes of making cocktails than the pedigrees of the races which they judged ". In any case, no standard had yet been written in 1910, and we were still unable to give the Dogue de Bordeaux precise morphological criteria, the specialists hesitating especially between the red mask and the black. As for the size, the weight and the type of head, they were so diverse that we began to distinguish three types of dogs: Bordeaux, Toulouse and Paris (some specimens being in fact implanted in France). of France). Professor Kunstler then published a very thorough study on the breed, Prolegomena to be used to establish the standard of the Dogue de Bordeaux, which, if it had not been presented to a French club Dogue de Bordeaux whose members s' confronted in sterile quarrels, would have had every chance of clarifying things once and for all. This club was dissolved, and from its ashes were born two other clubs in 1913: the Central Society of Dogue de Bordeaux and the Bordeaux Club of Dogue de Bordeaux. In sharp discussions, Paul Mégnin and Professor Kunstler were still the first to argue that the Dogue de Bordeaux had to have a normal jaw, the second, which referred to the practices of the breeders of the Aquitaine region, showing himself to be a strong supporter. of prognathism. It was not until 1926 that the two clubs finally agreed. A standard could be written, its authors taking care to spare the susceptibilities of each, admitting from now on the existence of two masks, red and black. The Bordeaux Dogs suffered terribly from the two world wars. Many breeders either dispersed or had almost disappeared; and in 1966, the only existing club had only about ten members. In 1970, however, the publication, under the leadership of Raymond Triquet and with the collaboration of Dr. Luquet, of a more complete and especially more precise standard than that elaborated at the end of the twenties, allowed the breed to be definitively recognized. by the International Cynological Federation. Since 1972, the Society of the amateurs of Dogues de Bordeaux has for task to develop the race in France; fortunately, after a particularly difficult post-war period, we can consider that the Dogue de Bordeaux is now well established there: in a logical way, in the South-West, but also in Provence, in the Paris region, in the East and in the North; and the herd can be estimated at about two thousand subjects, which is more than honorable. The breed is also established in Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Switzerland, Spain and on the American, African and Asian continents. The forbidding aspect and heavy past of this fighting dog may suggest that the Dogue de Bordeaux is a formidable animal. It is not so. All the owners even agree that these dogs are above all dogs very friendly, sweet, who aspire to one thing: to be near, very close to their master. Especially with the children, this mastiff weighing more than 50 kilos shows no aggression; on the contrary, he plays with them the role of protector, with a kindness that, given its size, might seem somewhat paradoxical. However, to be certain of having a well-balanced dog with you, that is to say of all confidence, it is advisable to educate him from an early age. It is the sine qua non to make him both an outstanding caretaker and a true companion, who will fit into the family environment. The Dogue de Bordeaux would hardly bear to be left attached all day outside the house. Of course, his training must not go through any form of coercion. Force and brutality, under the pretext that one is faced with an animal endowed with an extraordinary power, would only end up with contrary results. Admittedly, you have to be able to win against the puppy as soon as he is four or five months old, but always with justice. The master will know how to be warm, caress his dog, flatter him even if he has answered a command. Of course, that the ancestors of the Dogue de Bordeaux were fighting dogs does not mean that they were animals without great intelligence. This Great Dane, if we know how to do it, understands very well what is expected of him. Well trained, he reacts to any word expressed by his master, and is sometimes as eager to obey as some hunting dogs. The Dogue de Bordeaux is naturally fit for the guard; even if certain specimens, because their master wished it to be so, welcome the stranger in the most perfect indifference. In addition, with proper training, he is quite effective as a defense dog. Even detonations are not enough to impress him, as testified by a printer from Bordeaux, Barès, at the beginning of the century. When it comes to the expenses of food, it is true that they can put off more than one potential buyer. Because it is just as certain that, during his first two years, this dog has meat requirements well above average, which is not very surprising given its size. That being the case, we must know that this effort is essential to avoid any insufficiency of its skeleton. The breed, impressive in many ways, can indeed prove to be fragile health. The Dogues de Bordeaux, tragically too, live a little less old than the average of their congeners, perhaps precisely because of their massive nature. Nevertheless, this Dogue, for the some two thousand French families who have welcomed him, is a precious and endearing companion. |